Ranking Operations Management Conferences
نویسندگان
چکیده
Several publications have appeared in the field of Operations Management which rank Operations Management related journals. Several ranking systems exist for journals based on , for example, perceived relevance and quality, citation, and author affiliation. Many academics also publish at conferences but we have not come across publications that rank conferences. Conference rankings are generally more complicated than journal rankings. Journal rankings are primarily for publishing purposes. Conferences on the other hand are attended by people for different reasons. In this paper the first attempt is made in developing an operations management conference ranking based upon author affiliation. Ranking based on an analysis of author affiliation assumes that one important motive for participants is to attend a high quality research conference. With that assumption it is reasonable to use the author affiliation approach. Based upon an existing ranking of institutes that offer operations management programs a ranking list of affiliations is developed. Subsequently, we compare several operations management related conferences such as POMS, EurOMA, OSCM and the Operations Management Division of the Academy of Management based on that ranked list of institutes. The results provide information for authors that help in deciding which operations management oriented conferences to attend.
منابع مشابه
An integrated simulation-DEA approach to multi-criteria ranking of scenarios for execution of operations in a construction project
The purpose of this study is to examine different scenarios for implementing operations in the pre-construction phase of a project, based on several competing criteria with different importance levels in order to achieve a more efficient execution plan. This paper presents a new framework that integrates discrete event simulation (DES) and data envelopment analysis (DEA) to rank different scena...
متن کاملRanking business processes maturity by modified rembrandt technique with considering CMMI dimensions
An organization’s value is substantiated by consistent, high quality processes engineered in its operations and the allocation of the limited resources to achieve the desired objective. Intrinsic to the development of a process are the articulation of a coherent workflow, identification of the optimal skillset required at each stage of the process, and commissioning of the right technology plat...
متن کاملi 3 : Incomplete Information Inventory Models by Suresh P . Sethi , University of Texas at Dallas
Suresh P. Sethi is Charles & Nancy Davidson Distinguished Professor of Operations Management and Director of the Center for Intelligent Supply Networks at The University of Texas at Dallas. He has written 7 books and published more than 350 research papers in the fields of manufacturing and operations management, finance and economics, marketing, and optimization theory. He serves on the editor...
متن کاملOn Information Quality Ranking and Its Managerial Implications
We study the quality ranking of different information structures. In a unified setting, we present eight representations of essentially the same notion that may arise in distinct literatures, and also establish the intricate relationships among them. The forms that are less familiar to researchers turn out to be more relevant to the operations management context. We also relate the information ...
متن کاملMeasuring the attractiveness of academic journals: A direct influence aggregation model
Various journal-ranking algorithms have been proposed, most of them based on citation counts. This article introduces a new approach based on the reciprocal direct influence of all pairs of a list of journals. The proposed method is assessed against an opinion-based ranking published in 2005 for 25 operations research and management science (OR/MS) journals, and five existing approaches based o...
متن کامل